Post by Women in AI

Four Questions Chinese Courts Are Answering About AI China has no single AI governance statute. What it has, increasingly, is a body of decided cases; and read together, they are doing the work that legislation has not yet done. Four questions recur across the docket, and the answers courts are giving have direct implications for how AI products are built, deployed, and owned:  ▪️ What should AI not do? ▪️ Who is accountable? ▪️ What kind of oversight is sufficient? ▪️ What to do about vulnerable users? 📖 Read the full article by Dawn Y., a patent attorney and Shareholder at Jiaquan IP Law in China. Dawn’s practice focuses on patent invalidation proceedings and trade secret protection, in various industries, including AI. She also led and oversaw the development of the firm’s AI-assisted tool for monitoring CNIPA post-grant proceedings. ➡️ https://lnkd.in/eMkygXbf The WAI Legal Insights blog series is led by Women in AI Chief Legal Officer Silvia A. Carretta, PhD  and Dina Blikshteyn. Contributions welcome: reach out to Silvia ([email protected]) and Dina ([email protected]) if you'd like to share your insights! #WAILegalInsights #ArtificialIntelligence #AIandLaw