Post by Willow

A university ran a fault detection program for 10 years, but never got past the stage where signals fire and nobody acts on them. That's what James Dice calls "the Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) graveyard" on his recent Nexus Labs podcast with Brad Bonavida, PE, PMP. So why do we keep measuring CBM success by faults detected? What makes or breaks a CBM program is what happens after the signal fires. Is it trustworthy enough to act on? Does it route to the right person with the right context? Does someone close the loop to prove the fix worked? That's exactly what Willow presented at this week's NexusCast. Willow Technology Engineer Hannah James Baker walked through how Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) uses Willow to tackle the gap with: 💠 Sophisticated signals that can identify root cause, provide recommendations, and even perform initial functional tests 💠 Automation, alongside human reviews for more complex issues 💠 Closed-loop validation that confirms issues are fixed, plus quantifiable value Want the full recording and playbook? Comment "CBM" below. Listen to the full Nexus Labs podcast: https://lnkd.in/gTU4qvTF #OperationalAI #CBM #FacilitiesManagement #BuiltWorld