Post by Staats- en bestuursrecht Universiteit van Amsterdam
2,752 followers
๐จ๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐ท๐ธ๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ยท๐๐ข๐ก๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐๐บ ๐ผ๐ป ๐บ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐๐ถ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐บ ๐๏ธ Militant constitutionalism is often presented as a novel response to democratic backsliding. In his contribution to the IยทCONnect symposium, Ursus Eijkelenberg traces the genealogy of militant constitutionalism and argues that this seemingly novel concept largely rearticulates the logic, mechanisms, and sentiments of post-war constitutional consolidation. Reflecting critically on the underlying assumptions and potential consequences of militant constitutionalism, Ursus suggests that legalistic strategies for defending constitutional democracy may have reached their limits. The question is raised whether constitutional law has been moving in the wrong direction or has gone too far in what may once have been the right direction. The 10-part IยทCONnect symposium is the outcome of a workshop on militant constitutionalism organized by Michaล Stambulski, Corrado Caruso and Paul Blokker at Alma Mater Studiorum โ Universitร di Bologna. ๐ You can read Ursusโ contribution here: https://lnkd.in/e2ZpzRHE #staatsrecht #constitutionalism #democracy #UvA