Post by Tristan Radtke
Dr., LL.M. (NYU) | Postdoc, Digital transformation and private law
โ ๏ธ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ญ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐? ๐ค Together with Jakob Hรผger, I discussed at the Deutsche Stiftung fรผr Recht und Informatik #Herbstakademie 2025 potential flaws of the AI system provider definition and the fine regime under the #AIAct. "In this context, the article identifies an increased potential for circumvention under the AI Regulation in view of the formal connection between Art. 3 No. 3, Art. 25 AI Act and Art. 99 AI Act (fines). There appears to be no approach to address this sufficiently, although a solution based on the interpretation of Article 99 appears to be the most promising from a dogmatic point of view." Zusammen mit Jakob Hรผger durfte ich auf der DSRI Herbstakademie 2025 den #Anbieterbegriff der #KIVO sowie das Buรgeldregime der KI-VO auf Schwachstellen untersuchen. Unsere Ergebnisse finden sich im Tagungsband-Beitrag: Available soon (โฌ, DE): https://lnkd.in/enHYRQf6 Thanks to Prof. Dr. Anna K. Bernzen Heinze Christian Bjรถrn Steinrรถtter Romy Fiolka FYI u.a. #teamai Kai Zenner Tim Wybitul Heiko Roth, LL.M. Dr. Astrid Seehafer, M.Sc. Philipp Roos Caspar A. Brockhaus Weitz
