Post by Neisha H.

One of the most valuable approaches I bring to my work at the United Nations is how to disagree diplomatically . When I was beside someone advocating for the erosion of rights, rather than simply ignoring them, I put forth my hand and introduced myself. In multilateral spaces, disagreement is inevitable. I’ve had the opportunity to engage in conversations with individuals whose perspectives fundamentally differ from those of my delegation's policy priorities. But some of the most meaningful moments have come not from agreement, but from taking the time to understand where those perspectives come from. At its best, diplomacy is not about winning an argument. It is about creating space for dialogue that is civil, constructive, and grounded in mutual respect. As the political landscape evolves, we need to actively protect the conditions that make this possible: open inquiry, curiosity, and a willingness to listen. Constructive disagreement depends on both parties being willing to engage in good faith, to listen as much as they speak, and to approach conversations with respect rather than hostility. Without that, disagreement risks becoming polarisation, and dialogue breaks down. In a world that often feels increasingly divided, the ability to disagree productively is essential.