Post by Aravind Babu KS

A recent interview left me thinking... I joined the meeting a few minutes early. Camera on. Mic checked. Notebook ready. The interviewer joined. Camera off. For the next 45 minutes, I was speaking to a blank screen. Now, before anyone misunderstands me, I know there are valid reasons to keep the camera off - company policies, technical issues, poor internet, or other circumstances. This isn't about judging those situations. But when there isn't a reason, I can't help but wonder... As candidates, we're expected to show up prepared, communicate confidently, build rapport, and make a positive impression. Shouldn't the interview experience work both ways? An interview is more than a process to assess a candidate. It's also the first impression a company makes. A smile. A nod. A facial expression. These small things make the conversation feel human. As Scrum Masters, we often talk about transparency, trust, collaboration, and psychological safety. Those values don't stop at the team level they should be reflected in the hiring process too. This post isn't about whether cameras must be on. It's about creating a conversation where both sides feel respected and engaged. I'm curious to hear your thoughts. 👉 Have you ever been interviewed by someone who kept their camera off? 👉 If you're an interviewer, do you prefer to keep your camera on or off, and why? Let's have an honest discussion. Different perspectives are welcome. #InterviewExperience #CandidateExperience #Hiring #Recruitment #Leadership #ScrumMaster #Agile #CareerGrowth #Professionalism #JobSearch