Post by Mohammad Dayem A.

A feature went from idea to shipped PR today. Spec, architecture, backend, frontend, E2E tests, code review — all done. Zero human commits. Six agents: CEO, PM, Head of Engineering, Backend, Frontend, QA. All pushing from the same GitHub identity, all working toward a single clean PR. Before any of them wrote a line of code, we designed the rules. File ownership so agents never touch each other's code. A merge order that's non-negotiable: backend lands first, frontend rebases to pick up the types, QA runs against the feature branch. Gate checks between every handoff. Commit conventions that make the git log a readable audit trail when six agents share one identity. That part isn't glamorous. It's also the only reason this works. Skip it and you get what most teams get: merge conflicts, duplicated work, tests that pass locally and crater in CI, and no way to trace who broke what. Multi-agent dev isn't a prompt problem. It's an architecture problem. If you're building something similar and want to see how we structured ours, drop a comment or DM. Happy to share the reference doc. P.S Ghostship episode 3 goes out tomorrow.

Video Content