Post by Liezl Coetzee

Accidental AInthropologist | Human–AI Decision Systems for Social Risk, Accountability & Institutional Memory

Sunday’s musical interlude, in its best Sunday-school appropriateness, went exactly where it was supposed to go. Monday did not. Monday’s piece has been live on my personal feed, brightly present and entirely out of sequence, while failing to appear in the Sociable Systems newsletter where the Holy Arc properly began. Which is, in its own annoying way, almost too fitting. This is an arc about moral jurisdiction, hidden defaults, formation, institutional routing, and who gets to name the perimeter before a system becomes normal. Naturally, the first full article in the arc was itself quietly routed to the wrong room. So this is another archive repair: not a new piece, but the Monday installment restored to the newsletter sequence. It begins with Pope Leo XIV’s Magnifica Humanitas, signed on 15 May 2026 to mark the anniversary of Rerum Novarum, and with one word that changes the governance frame: Disarmed. The question is not only whether AI can be regulated, aligned, audited, or made safer after deployment. The harder question is what the system has already been armed to serve. Here, belatedly restored to the proper room, is Monday’s Holy Arc installment.

Post content