Post by LHAG

12,409 followers

πƒπžπ«π’π―πšπ­π’π―πž π€πœπ­π’π¨π§: πƒπ¨πžπ¬ 𝐋𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐟 π’π­πšπ§ππ’π§π  𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐑𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩π₯𝐚𝐒𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐭 πƒπžπŸπžπšπ­ 𝐭𝐑𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐒𝐧𝐠𝐬? A recent High Court decision in Dato’ Seri Timor Shah Rafiq v Nautilus Tug & Towage Sdn Bhd [Suit No. WA-24NCC-677-12/2023] clarifies a key issue under Section 347 of the Companies Act 2016: what happens when the complainant loses his standing after commencing the derivative action? In this brief article, we examine the High Court’s grounds of judgment in deciding whether a complainant must maintain his locus standi throughout the derivative proceedings. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact Senior Associate, Harvey Ng Yih Xiang ([email protected]) or Associates, Ong Zhi Qian ([email protected]) and Kamiliacheng ([email protected]). #lhagmy #lhaginsights #TMT #Company #DerivativeAction #Commercial #Corporate #Disputes

Post contentPost contentPost content