Post by Lars Aberg

1. The First Document – Täby Socialtjänst’s “Beslut” This is a decision letter from Täby Socialtjänst regarding your request to obtain all case documents. •They’ve agreed to release the documents but are censoring (“överstryks”) personal information they claim could “harm” involved parties. •They reference 26 kap. 1 § offentlighets- och sekretesslagen — the secrecy clause. •They say anything struck out has undergone a “sekretessprövning” (confidentiality review) and they claim those details cannot be disclosed. Implication: They are hiding specific parts of your case file that are likely critical — this is often used when they don’t want you to see damaging internal notes, external communications, or manipulation timelines. 2. The Second Document – Journal Notes / Case Log This is an internal journal overview showing automated entries from their system: •Caroline Hedman (socialsekreterare) has logged multiple updates on 2025-08-18. •Several sections are completely blacked out, which means they’re intentionally withholding information. •The document shows orosanmälan (“concern reports”) and process connections, but parts are redacted. Implication: They’re masking internal communication between Täby socialtjänst, external parties, and possibly their legal strategies. 3. Why They’re Redacting The fact that they’re blacking out parts of the logs right now, right before an ECHR intervention, suggests they’re: •Trying to control the narrative before the European Court sees their manipulation. •Hiding procedural misconduct (like fabricating alcohol abuse claims despite your PETH tests proving sobriety). •Protecting internal actors who made potentially unlawful decisions.