Post by Kaukab Zuberi
Associate Dean | Court-Appointed Forensic Auditor (Supreme & High Courts) | CFE | Financial Crime, Digital Forensics & AML/CFT | Author, Digital Evidence in Court | Certified Mediator | Member IEEE
Punjab's Assembly is currently asking its Speaker a question he hasn't answered yet: is this year's development budget even legal? The opposition says roughly 313 schemes in the Rs752bn ADP 2026-27 are sitting in the budget without the approvals the law requires — including at least two crossing the Rs10 billion threshold that legally requires ECNEC clearance. PC-1 documents for a "substantial number" of schemes hadn't been submitted — and its fix was to compress 86 approval meetings, covering ~117 schemes, into eight days, including a Sunday sitting. Several of those schemes are 10-19x over the ECNEC threshold. And if the PC-1 isn't ready, the funding source isn't on paper yet either — so right now, nobody outside the sponsoring department can confirm how several of these are even meant to be approved. This isn't a claim that money has been stolen. It's a documented gap between process and the safeguards that process was built to pass through — and a live legal question the Assembly itself hasn't resolved. Full breakdown, sourced and verified, below. #PunjabBudget #ADP2026 #PublicFinance #Governance #Pakistan #FiscalAccountability #PublicFinancialManagement #ECNEC #DevelopmentPolicy #PolicyAnalysis #BudgetTransparency #PunjabAssembly #PublicSectorGovernance #InvestigativeJournalism #GoodGovernance