Post by James Barrood

Innovation Maestro + Growth Advisor | TEDx Speaker x2 | Board Member | Host, 'A Few Things' Pod | Super Connector | Nurturing Ecosystems + Driving Collaborations | Author | AI Strategist/Educator | Girl Dad

I've been wondering... When you're scrolling LinkedIn these days, how much of what you're reading do you think was actually written by a human? Not AI-assisted. Not "cleaned up." Actually generated by AI. A new analysis of more than one million social posts suggests the number on LinkedIn is much higher than most people would guess. Whether that number is exactly right isn't even the most interesting question. The real question is: Does it matter? If an idea is valuable, do you care whether AI helped write it? Or does authenticity still matter enough that you'd rather read something imperfect but unmistakably human? Vote and then tell me where you draw the line between "AI-assisted" and "AI-generated." I'm curious where the community lands.