Post by Galileo

The EU pushed the AI Act's hardest rules to 2027, but you can't reconstruct an audit log in 2027 for decisions your system made in 2026. The high-risk obligations that slipped to December 2027 don't reward waiting, because none of them are paperwork: – Article 9 wants a living risk management system with post-deployment monitoring. Not a one-time sign-off. – Article 12 wants automatic, tamper-evident logging of every input, output, and timestamp across the system's lifetime. – Article 13 wants decisions a human can trace and interpret. – Article 14 wants humans who can understand, intervene, override, and halt the system. – Article 15 wants accuracy, robustness, and resistance to adversarial attacks. – Article 73 gives you 72 hours to report a serious incident. Every one is something you build into the system, not something you write up afterward. Retrofit them in 2027 and you're rebuilding, not documenting. Don't wait for 2027 to find out what you didn't log. Turn on decision-level logging before an auditor asks for it. Put a human in the loop on the calls that matter. This is the work we already do at Galileo. ✅ Agent Graph traces every step, tool call, and decision, so the reasoning chain exists when an auditor asks.  ✅ Luna-2 evals turn every production score into a structured record.  ✅ Runtime Protection blocks unsafe actions before they reach a user, and hot-reloadable policies close a gap across an entire agent fleet in minutes. ✅ Annotation queues put a human in the loop on the decisions that matter, which is exactly what Article 14 means by oversight. ✅ Signals catches failures in real time, so the clock starts when it happens, not when someone notices. You can't reconstruct an audit trail you never logged, and Galileo is here to help 🤝