Post by European Legal Technology Association (ELTA)

15,805 followers

Most law firms treat AI literacy as a training problem. Schedule a workshop, run a demo, hand out a guide, and consider the gap closed. That approach solves the wrong layer of the problem. The firms actually adapting well aren’t the ones with the best training programs. They’re the ones where leadership made a real decision about how the firm will work differently, and then built the training to support that decision, not the other way around. Training without a leadership choice behind it produces people who know how to use a tool and still have no idea what problem it’s meant to solve for their practice. That’s why so many AI rollouts stall after the first few weeks: the skill was taught, but the judgment about when and why to use it was never actually decided by anyone senior enough to make it stick. The firms getting real value now made the decision first. Training came second. Who owns that decision at your firm, the tool or the leadership? #LegalTech #LegalLeadership #LegalInnovation #LawFirmManagement #FutureOfLaw #ELTA Grégoire Miot 🦋Marisa Borsboom Jon Bartman Vera Moreno Patricia Gannon Alan Ragueneau Heikki Ilvessalo Margrét Anna Einarsdóttir Marko Porobija Zohar Fisher Namit Oberoy Antje Fedderke Paulius Astromskis Regina Barchan (ex Bondarenko) Ana-Maria Drăgănuță Briard Dmytro Gadomsky Ebru Metin, LL.M Frode Preber Ettesvoll Helena Hallgarn Holger Zscheyge Ivan Rašić Jeremy Small Jeroen Zweers Konstantinos P. Anagnostopoulos Laura Fauqueur Marcus M. Schmitt Natallia Seniuta Nicolino Gentile Silvano Donato Lorusso Peter Bilyk Zsolt Ződi Ondřej Matějka Leïla El Gharbi ☀️ MOHAMED G.

Post content