Post by eisq - Outsourcing-Beratung

1,168 followers

š˜ š˜°š˜¶š˜³ š˜Ŗš˜Æš˜Æš˜°š˜·š˜¢š˜µš˜Ŗš˜°š˜Æ š˜±š˜¢š˜³š˜µš˜Æš˜¦š˜³ š˜±š˜³š˜°š˜®š˜Ŗš˜“š˜¦š˜“ š˜¢š˜Øš˜Ŗš˜­š˜Ŗš˜µš˜ŗ. š˜ š˜°š˜¶š˜³ š˜³š˜¦š˜Øš˜¶š˜­š˜¢š˜µš˜°š˜³ š˜„š˜¦š˜®š˜¢š˜Æš˜„š˜“ š˜±š˜³š˜°š˜°š˜§ š˜°š˜§ š˜“š˜µš˜¢š˜£š˜Ŗš˜­š˜Ŗš˜µš˜ŗ. Anyone responsible for outsourcing in pharma IT knows this tension — and knows it cannot be argued away. Bernhard Gandolf worked through exactly this with Martin Ganser, Chiesi Group. Three things we take from the conversation: šŸ’Š Outcome models shift responsibility — not liability. In validated environments, you still need to explain how a result was produced. "We delivered" is not enough. āš–ļø SLAs are not a relic. They are the language regulators, auditors, and quality systems understand. Remove them and you create blind spots. šŸ”¬ The right question is not outcome vs. SLA. It's: which processes are stable enough for outcome orientation — and where does a measurable quality framework remain non-negotiable? šŸ“‹ Many providers sell agility that works in their world. Not yours. You find that out at the next audit — not at contract signing. šŸ”— Link in the comments. #PharmaOutsourcing #VendorManagement #OutsourcingGovernance #LifeSciences #Compliance

Post content

Video Content