Post by eisq - Outsourcing-Beratung
1,168 followers
š š°š¶š³ šŖšÆšÆš°š·š¢šµšŖš°šÆ š±š¢š³šµšÆš¦š³ š±š³š°š®šŖš“š¦š“ š¢šØšŖššŖšµšŗ. š š°š¶š³ š³š¦šØš¶šš¢šµš°š³ š„š¦š®š¢šÆš„š“ š±š³š°š°š§ š°š§ š“šµš¢š£šŖššŖšµšŗ. Anyone responsible for outsourcing in pharma IT knows this tension ā and knows it cannot be argued away. Bernhard Gandolf worked through exactly this with Martin Ganser, Chiesi Group. Three things we take from the conversation: š Outcome models shift responsibility ā not liability. In validated environments, you still need to explain how a result was produced. "We delivered" is not enough. āļø SLAs are not a relic. They are the language regulators, auditors, and quality systems understand. Remove them and you create blind spots. š¬ The right question is not outcome vs. SLA. It's: which processes are stable enough for outcome orientation ā and where does a measurable quality framework remain non-negotiable? š Many providers sell agility that works in their world. Not yours. You find that out at the next audit ā not at contract signing. š Link in the comments. #PharmaOutsourcing #VendorManagement #OutsourcingGovernance #LifeSciences #Compliance
Video Content