Post by Dr Tom Courtney

Owner of Courtney Governance Limited, Author and speaker on company law and corporate governance

The latest Bloomsbury Professional Company Law Update (April 2026) is now on my website https://lnkd.in/eB6Y2AhZ In the June 2026 update I summarise a number of important company law decisions in Ireland and the UK. The first case noted is that of our Supreme Court in ๐’๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ฒ & ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‹๐ข๐ฆ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐œ๐ค ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐‹๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ฏ ๐•๐‡๐ˆ [2026] IESC 32 where the Supreme Court provided definitive guidance on the circumstances in which a delay in bringing a motion for security for costs will be a special circumstance which justify the refusal of the application, even though the plaintiff company is insolvent and even though the defendant has a prima facie defence to the claim. The second decision noted is that of the UKโ€™s Court of Appeal in ๐’๐จ๐ง๐  ๐š๐ง๐ ๐™๐ก๐š๐จ ๐ฏ ๐’๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐š๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ [2026] EWCA Civ 719 where the court reversed the High Court in finding that the rule against profit by fiduciaries was a strict rule, applying the recent UK Supreme Court decision in ๐‘๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐ง๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐†๐ ๐‹๐ญ๐ ๐ฏ ๐‘๐ฎ๐ค๐ก๐š๐๐ณ๐ž [2025] UKSC 10. The important decision of the Federal Court of Australia in ๐€๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐š๐ง ๐’๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฏ ๐๐ž๐ค๐ข๐ž๐ซ [2026] FCA 196 in which the duties of executive and non-executive directors were explored as was the ability of non-executives to rely on the executives to discharge ordinary managerial matters. Two decisions of the High Court, both given by Sanfey J are also noted: ๐‘๐ž ๐ƒ๐š๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐š ๐‡๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ฅ ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐œ [2025] IEHC 768 (which concerns the sanctioning of a scheme and the application of the established criteria) andย  ๐‘๐ž ๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐“๐’๐ ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐‡๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐๐‹๐‚2026] IEHC 317 (where it was determined that ordinarily an Irish court would not confirm appropriate class composition at the convening stage since it was obliged to do this at the sanctioning stage and that in this respect Irish law differed in practice from that in the UK). Two other really interesting Irish High Court decisions to consider company law topics are also considered: the decision of Dunne J in ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐จ ๐‹๐ญ๐ ๐ฏ ๐‹๐ฒ๐ง๐œ๐ก & ๐‹๐ฒ๐ง๐œ๐ก [2026] IEHC 336 in which a claim that the directors of an ownersโ€™ management company were liable for that companyโ€™s default and that the members of an OMC could sue the directors for breach of duty were both rejected; and finally the decision of Oisรญn Quinn J in ๐‘๐ž ๐ƒ๐จ๐ง๐ง๐š ๐‹๐ž๐๐ฐ๐ข๐ ๐ž ๐†๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐‹๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐; ๐ƒ๐จ๐ฒ๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฏ ๐‹๐ž๐๐ฐ๐ข๐๐ ๐ž & ๐‹๐ž๐๐ฐ๐ข๐๐ ๐ž ๐‡๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐‹๐ญ๐ [2026] IEHC 329 in which it has been made clear that proceedings for rectification of a companyโ€™s register of members under s 173 of the Companies Act 2014 will not be appropriate where the title is disputed and plenary proceedings are in being to determine the applicantโ€™s rights.