Post by CYLAD

13,730 followers

๐—œ๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ&๐—— ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜๐—ต ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜? For decades, industrial companies have built their success on hardware products and after-sales services. Today, a third growth pillar is emerging: ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ-๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ณ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ โ€“ from smart machine functionalities to digital twins, predictive maintenance, and AI-driven applications. However, many companies underestimate a critical reality: software cannot be managed as โ€œhardware plus code.โ€ Building a successful software business requires a fundamentally different approach to R&D: โœ” Different investment priorities โœ” Software R&D funding at competitive levels โœ” Faster development cycles โœ” A stronger focus on scalability and recurring value creation In our latest study, we analyzed 180 global technology and software companies, comparing hardware-centric organizations with pure software players. The findings reveal clear patterns that distinguish companies that successfully scale profitable software businesses from those that struggle to unlock their full potential. The real question isnโ€™t "Can we afford more R&D?", but "Can we afford not to?" Dr. Michael Mรผller Dr. Robert Schenk Fabian Czilwa #Software #DigitalTransformation #IndustrialTech #Innovation #R&D

Post contentPost contentPost content