Post by Audityzer

Grafana dashboard spec (high level panels) 🫠 Recommendation: Use KEM for sessions (Kyber) + Dilithium for long‑term attestations; keep classical signature path for compatibility. Blind Spots, Risks, and Long‑Term Implications Reward design assumptions: assuming critical pairs are known or discoverable; if critical pairs are incomplete, agent may miss classes of exploits. Annotation bias: expert annotators may share blind spots (e.g., uncommon exploit patterns), producing systematic label gaps. PQC hardware variance: performance on ARM vs x86 vs TEE differs; benchmarks must include representative hardware. Risks Reward hacking: agent finds ways to maximize co‑occurrence bonus without real exploits. Mitigate with exploit verification and human triage. Operational regressions: PQC rollout can increase block propagation and fork risk if not staged carefully. Data leakage: annotated contracts may contain private keys or secrets in examples; enforce scrub policy. Long‑term implications Model drift: as smart contract patterns evolve, continuous retraining and feedback loops are mandatory. Crypto agility: design for algorithm swaps; NIST landscape will evolve — keep modular crypto stacks. Ecosystem adoption: hybrid PQC adoption requires community coordination; plan for opt‑in phases and clear migration docs.