Post by Anandaday Misshra
Data Privacy(DPDPA) & AI Lawyer | Founder, & Managing Partner, AMLEGALS(Pan India) I Architect of Vibe Data Privacyโข and DPDPA Resilience Proโข Framework | GST I Arbitration Advocate I GRC Professional I Author I Speaker
๐๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐ฌ: ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐! ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ Can evidence obtained in breach of privacy, specifically call data records accessed by a husband without his wifeโs consent, be admissible in matrimonial proceedings? ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐ The petitioner wife argued that this unauthorized access violated her ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ. The court ruled in her favor, emphasizing the inadmissibility of ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ and the necessity of certification for electronic records under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. This case is also in other way a tribute to ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ฐ๐๐ฆ๐ฒ, who recently passed away while leaving behind a bedrock of "๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ" as Madras HC also derived its footing from the ratio laid down in aadhaar by Supreme Court of India. #dataprivacy #dpdpa #amlegals #privacy
