Post by ADP Elite Link Ltd

To Advance £278,000 In Additional Costs. First Ask the Basic Question Where is the Audit Trail For the Double Counted Cost Documents of Over Half a Million Pounds? A Litigant In Person taken Advantage of, He Requested #Verification His Voice Shut down. Article (6) a Right to a fair hearing Denied. The Tribunal Claimed they had "No reason to dispute the respondents evidence relied upon". How? 46 Cost Lines Altered Payroll and Contracts. Evidence Based on Recycled Hearsay The Project Managers Own Eight2O JV Accounts Demonstrate Two Ledgers Before and After. #Counsels Respondents Witness Statement Contains Two Costs Histories One True Costs Known "No Loss" position In Section (4) Suppressed Truth The Recurring Sequence Of Advanced In The Witness Statement Evidence In Section 20 is: ⬇️ #Deflate ⬇️ #Reduce ⬇️ #Remove ⬆️ #Restore ⬆️ #Reinflate ⬆️ #Increase Witness statement: "On 22 September #Eight2O PM emailed #HR, Senior HR and myself evidence on the costs incurred to date on both the Essendon and Dorchester projects that Victim had been involved with." The witness continued: "As can be seen, the #estimated budget for #Essendon was just £35,000 and the costs incurred to date were £172,000." And further: "The #Dorchester project had also been #forecast at £35,000 and again costs on that project were £176,000 to date." The witness then relied upon the Project Manager's conclusion: "We are currently £278,000 over our original budgets, which I firmly believe is primarily attributable to Victim's involvement in these schemes."